The Nation journalistic critique

The Nation’s journalists need to review their own behavior

Re: The irony of Eyes Wide Shut by The Nation’s staff who have been hit over the head by preposterous, overwhelming evidence that was heard and seen by witnesses at the WTC collapse of all three buildings that (randomly) crashed at free fall speed into their own footprint.

For the entire Nation staff to accept the 9/11 Commission version when it excluded any mention of the Building 7 collapse, and excluded the testimony of credible witnesses – makes its own observations of David Broder trivial.

Were the reporters and firefighters at the WTC on 9/11 all hallucinating when they remarked on tape that they heard explosions? Can massive steel columns throughout the center of those buildings be slashed into pieces by the heat of a jet fuel fire?

Here is the precise quote by CBS anchor Dan Rather. “We’re going to show you a video tape of the collapse itself. For the third time today we’re going to show you, it is reminiscent of a building deliberately destroyed by dynamite to knock it down.”

Does Dan’s silence fail to make you journalists suspicious? Why has Dan’s prominence disappeared? David Broder was a pipsqueak compared to Dan Rather.

Architect Richard Gage uses his professional knowledge to scientifically describe why the 9/11 Commission’s Report should hit you between the eyes for its being ludicrous
http://www.911blogger.com/node/10025

Will your eyes remain wide shut on this issue while you concentrate on the comments of Peggy Noonan and David Broder? How much time would it take experts to rig the necessary charges needed to make all three buildings collapse? Who has the power to order the charges rigged to explode synchronistically? Who has the power to order the NORAD F-16’s to leave their post?